Zoom Alternatives in 2026: 8 Tools Compared

Google Meet is the simplest switch for a team that already lives in Gmail and Google Calendar. A meeting link sits inside a calendar invite, guests join from a browser, and there is no separate app to install for basic calls. Free group calls allow up to 100 people for up to 60 minutes, which covers many team meetings and classes.

The limits appear when you need recording, breakout rooms at scale or larger meetings, since those features sit on paid Workspace plans. Meet also lacks some dedicated webinar tools, such as advanced registration and analytics. For everyday internal and client meetings, though, Meet is clean, reliable and easy for guests to join.

Microsoft Teams suits organisations that already pay for Microsoft 365, because meetings sit alongside chat, files and Office apps. A team can move from a chat thread to a video call, share a document and keep the discussion in one place. Free Teams meetings allow group calls up to 60 minutes with up to 100 people, which covers many small-team needs.

The main complaint is complexity. Teams is a full collaboration hub, so a user who only wants a meeting link may find the interface busy. It also works best inside Microsoft 365, so Google-first teams will get less value. For a Microsoft shop, however, Teams is usually the cheapest and most integrated Zoom replacement.

Webex, from Cisco, suits larger organisations that need strong admin controls, compliance features and meeting room hardware. Its free plan allows meetings with up to 100 people, which is useful for a first test, and paid plans add recording, larger meetings and events. Webex also works well with Cisco room systems, which matters for offices with dedicated meeting rooms.

The free 40-minute limit mirrors Zoom, so Webex does not solve that problem on its own. Paid pricing also needs checking against a suite you already pay for, since Teams or Meet may be included in that suite at no extra cost. Choose Webex when enterprise controls and room hardware matter more than suite bundling.

Jitsi Meet is the best choice when you need a call now and do not want signups. You create a room, share the link and guests join from a browser, with no account required. The open-source code also allows a technical team to host Jitsi on its own servers, which suits privacy-focused organisations that want control over data.

The trade-off is support and polish. The public service has usage limits, and there is no support team to call when a call fails. Features such as recording and advanced moderation are simpler than in paid tools. For quick calls, interviews and community meetings, Jitsi is hard to beat on simplicity and cost, as long as you accept those limits.

GoTo Meeting appeals to teams that want meetings to just work, without a full collaboration suite. The joining flow is simple, dial-in numbers help guests with poor internet, and paid plans include recording and screen sharing. For a small business that runs client calls and team meetings, that reliability matters more than chat channels or file hubs.

The lack of a free plan is the main limit, though a trial lets you test it first. GoTo Meeting also offers less than Teams or Meet for document collaboration, so teams that need chat and files may still need another tool. For meeting-first teams, GoTo Meeting is a steady and uncomplicated Zoom alternative.

Zoho Meeting suits small teams and Zoho users who want a low-cost meeting tool. The free plan covers small meetings, and paid plans start at a low price compared with many rivals. If your team already uses Zoho Mail, CRM or other Zoho apps, Meeting fits naturally into that workflow.

The ecosystem is smaller than Google Workspace or Microsoft 365, so teams outside Zoho get less integration value. Webinar features also sit on higher plans, so check those tiers if you run public events. For internal meetings on a tight budget, Zoho Meeting offers a clear and affordable path away from Zoom.

Whereby is built for easy guest access. A host shares a room link, and guests join from a browser without installing an app or creating an account. That simplicity helps for client calls, coaching sessions and interviews, where a download step can lose a guest. Custom room links also make repeat meetings easy to remember.

Free plan limits are the catch, with shorter meetings and fewer participants than paid plans. Whereby is also not a webinar platform, so large public events need another tool. For one-to-one and small-group meetings where guest ease matters most, Whereby is one of the smoothest Zoom alternatives.

Discord suits communities, gaming groups, study groups and clubs that want an ongoing place to chat and meet. Servers and channels keep conversations organised, voice channels allow drop-in talk, and video chats work for smaller groups. Screen sharing also helps for study sessions and collaborative work.

Discord is less suited to formal client meetings, since it lacks the calendar, recording and admin polish of business tools. Server video limits also matter for larger groups. Treat Discord as a community alternative to Zoom, not as a boardroom replacement, and it can be a lively and free option for groups that already use it.